What Will It Take?
By Owen G. Collins and Rod Turner
Now
that the dust has settled from all the assisted-living development that occurred
in the mid-to-late '90s, industry survivors are wondering if new business
development opportunities will occur. The development boom and subsequent market
saturation in many popular metropolitan areas has left many developers,
operators and, perhaps most important, lenders and investors licking their
wounds. Large national operators, smaller regional companies and local
developers all contributed to the over development in certain markets throughout
the nation. Many operators are experiencing ongoing cash-flow deficits resulting
from partially built developments, protracted absorption periods, low occupancy
levels, escalating resident-care costs, increased regulatory scrutiny, higher
borrowing costs and rapidly rising insurance rates.
Current Perspective
To understand investors' current perception of nursing home and assisted-
living providers is to realize stock market capitalization has decreased by
roughly 70 percent between the end of 1998 and today. However, capital sources
for the industry have not completely dried up. Many operators have turned to the
federal government for help with funding new construction, acquisition and
refinancing of assisted-living facilities. The U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) has specialized programs such as Section 232, which
insures mortgages for assisted-living communities. In addition, Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac offer financing programs for existing stabilized assisted-living
facilities.
Local, regional and even national banks will still loan to quality operators
with proven track records and an acceptable balance sheet. The loans offered
however, are at more conservative (70 percent or less) loan-to-value ratios and
require the borrower to bring both hard equity dollars and adequate working
capital to the closing table. Tax-exempt bond financing is also available to
both for-profit and nonprofit operators, but the same requirements regarding a
good track record, equity and liquidity still apply.
National Outlook
The number of reported new facilities being constructed in 2000 was at its
lowest level in five years. The national vacancy rate is estimated at
approximately 10 percent, and can be as great as 40 percent or 50 percent in
some highly saturated markets. Certain existing operators in saturated markets
are relying on the decrease in new construction to result in truncated
absorption periods and higher overall occupancy rates.
Recent
data released from the 2000 Census indicates a first ever lag in the growth rate
of people age 65 and older (12 percent increase) compared to the general
population (13 percent increase). The recent problems experienced by the
industry caused many traditional capital sources to shy away and even bad-mouth
the assisted-living industry, questioning its concept and future viability as a
care alternative. These same capital sources have turned their attention to
other types of senior housing that have either minimal care components such as
independent living and the younger (55+) active-adult market, or a full
continuum of care offered by continuing-care retirement communities.
Other significant capital sources, such as real estate investment trusts (REITs),
that enthusiastically participated in the development boom, find their
portfolios heavily weighted toward assisted living. They need to either divest
assisted-living assets or restrict further investment in assisted living until
their portfolios become more diversified. Several healthcare REITs still have
significant exposure in the nursing home industry, which continues to have an
adverse impact on their earnings. This in turn, makes it difficult for the REIT
to access the capital markets and raise new investment capital.
The banking industry, although not completely averse to lending to the
industry, is experiencing rising loan losses due to the current weakening of the
economy and has responded by significantly tightening its overall credit
criteria for all types of loans. This bleak national outlook, however, does not
mean there aren't opportunities to develop new, financially viable
assisted-living facilities in select markets.
What It Will Take?
Just like each market has a unique thumbprint, operators increase the odds
for their project's success if they can demonstrate a market niche. Certain
assisted-living developers have the greatest chance of getting their project
financed if they have:
- A proven track record;
- A realistic business plan;
- Product recognition;
- Strong ties to the local community;
- Substantial equity, preferably cash;
- Complementary services in the same service area;
- Demonstrated quality care; and
- Competitive prices.
Recently, some regional and local operators have been able to acquire
facilities at substantial discounts from some of the publicly held national
chains. It's clearly a buyers' market, with some recent purchase prices reported
as low as 45 percent of the prior owner's cost to construct just three years
ago. Discounted purchase prices can be passed onto the consumer enabling an
operator to be a low-cost provider of services in a market.
Without a doubt, it is more difficult today than it was a mere two years ago
to find lenders and investors willing to fund start-up, free-standing
assisted-living facilities, but it is certainly not impossible. Whether
developing new or acquiring existing assisted-living assets to ensure a
facility's financial success, operators must thoroughly analyze and correctly
assess the demand for their proposed service. Accurately forecasting the
absorption period and stabilized occupancy rate is the most critical element in
planning for a project's success because it is the most singularly important
operating element. Without residents, there are no other operational issues that
warrant managing.
Almost all lenders and investors currently require a market-feasibility study
conducted by an independent third party as part of their due diligence when
making a decision to fund a project. Many lenders and investors also require an
independent prepared financial feasibility study and appraisal. As an example,
even HUD's new Multifamily Accelerated Processing (MAP) initiative requires a
market-demand study for existing assisted-living projects with a demonstrated
history of highly stabilized occupancy levels.
The following table summarizes a few funding sources when seeking to finance
acquisitions of existing or planned assisted-living facilities.
| Financing |
Loan Size |
Equity Required |
Recourse |
Interest Rate |
Term |
Other |
| Conventional |
Varies |
At least 30% |
Yes |
Varies |
Short to intermediate |
Low issuance costs and short
approval period |
| REITs |
Prefer large |
5% |
Varies |
High |
Intermediate |
Sale/Leaseback with equity
participation |
| HUD's 232 Program |
Varies |
Non-profit 10%; for profit
15% |
No |
Low |
Long |
New MAP program has shortened
the period it takes to receive a firm commitment |
| Taxable and Tax-Exempt Bond
Issues |
Varies |
5%-20% |
No |
Low |
Long |
High issuance and forward
reserve costs. For-profits can access tax-exempt bond financing if they
are willing to set aside units for qualifying low-income residents. |
Owen G. Collins is senior manager and Rod Turner is senior principal for
HTG Consultants. The company is a nationally recognized senior-living consulting
firm with proven capabilities in conducting market demand and financial
feasibility studies, business valuations, and real estate appraisals on behalf
of developers, operators, lenders and investors. For more information, call
(302) 322-4100.
|